Lady Judge throws case into the street.  She ruled that under the U.S. Constitution, nightclubs can charge men more for admission than females, but as a result cannot charge guys more for a drink.  So if you can make it to the bar, you're home-free. 

Currently on appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
 

Clinton Judge rules the Violence Against Women Act doesn't injure American men.  Judge Willaim H. Pauley III's decision ignored the democratic and legal standard of fairness, applied the wrong legal test for injury on a dismissal motion, and invented a fact not before the Court.  VAWA allows alien females to acquire citizenship by falsely accusing their American husbands, or ex-husbands, of mistreatment.  The Federal Government uses proceedings kept secret from the U.S. citizen to find that he committed "battery," "extreme cruelty," or an "overall pattern of violence" even when no violence has occurred. 

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied the appeal.   VAWA keeps secret from U.S. citizens the proceedings that find a citizen husband abused his alien wife.  Since VAWA secrecy prevented the plaintiffs from finding out what happened in the proceedings or how the behind closed-door fact-findings were used against them, the Second Circuit dismissed their complaint as "speculative."  The powerful often use a Catch-22 as a last resort.

U.S. Supreme Court denied the Petition for Certiorari.  The case is over, and it's clear that to the courts men just don't count.

Federal lawsuit to find that Columbia University violates Title IX and the Equal Protection clause of the U.S. Constitution by offering a Women's Studies program but not a Men's Studies program, and that N.Y. State and the Federal Government aid Columbia's preaching of the religious belief system "Feminism."  Judge Lewis A. Kaplan dismissed the case saying "Feminism is no more a religion than physics," basically ignored the Title IX and Equal Protection claims, and called the case "absurd."

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied the appeal.  The Court ruled that any harm caused guys by the lack of a Men's Studies Program was "speculative."  Strange that the federal courts don't say the same about the lack of a girls' sports team when a college only has a guys' team.  Apparently the law is adjudicated one way for girls and another way for guys.

I beleive the trilogy of lawsuits that I brought in favor of men's rights makes clear that there are now two classes of people in America:  one of princesses--females, and the other of servants--males.  Governments, from local to state to federal, treat men as second class citizens whose rights can be violated with impunity when it benefits females.

"[H]istory shows that people have a way of not being willing to bear oppressive grievances without protest.  Such protests, when bottomed upon facts, lead almost inevitably to an irresistible popular demand for either a redress of those grievances or a change in the Government.  Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Bd., 367 U.S. 1, 167 (Justice Black dissenting).

You may donate any amount to the Men's Rights (MR) Legal Fund by clicking on the Donate button at left. All donors will be kept confidential.

Roy Den Hollander is available for interviews, debates, speaking engagements, litigation, and civil protest.

For more on protecting your rights, go to Marc Rudov's Nononsense Territory http://TheNoNonsenseMan.com